Hemorrhage induced by antithrombotic agents: new insights from a real-world pharmacovigilance study.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage represents the most common and serious side effect of antithrombotic agents. Many studies have compared the risk of bleeding between different antithrombotic agents, but analysis of time-to-onset for hemorrhage induced by these drugs is yet sparse. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study based on the adverse drug reaction reports on antithrombotic agents collected by the Henan Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Center. We assessed the reporting odds ratio to determine the disproportionate reporting signals for bleeding and the Weibull shape parameter was used to evaluate the time-to-onset data. RESULTS: In the signal detection, crude low molecular weight heparin-hemorrhage was found as a positive signal. The hemorrhage for most antithrombotic agents was random failure profiles. In particular, the hazard of hemorrhage decreased over time for warfarin and clopidogrel and increased for alteplase, nadroparin, and dipyridamole. CONCLUSION: We found that the risk of bleeding in patients taking Crude low molecular weight heparins was significantly higher compared to other antithrombotic agents, but with a small magnificence, which may be attributed to the severely irrational use of this medication under improper management. Statistics in days, results showed that the risk of bleeding decreased over time for warfarin and clopidogrel and increased for alteplase, nadroparin, and dipyridamole.

Smaller nadroparin dose reductions required for patients with renal impairment: A multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines advise 50 % and 25 % dose reduction of the therapeutic nadroparin dose (86 IU/kg) in patients with eGFR 15-29 and 30-60 ml/min respectively. For monitoring, peak anti-Xa levels are suggested. Data lack whether this results in therapeutic anti-Xa levels or in anti-Xa levels that are comparable to those of patients without renal impairment. AIMS: To determine dose ranges in patients with renal impairment that result in therapeutic anti-Xa levels and to determine the percentage of the 86 IU/kg dose that results in anti-Xa levels normally occurring in patients without renal impairment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in five hospitals. Patients ≥18 years of age, with an eGFR ≥ 15 ml/min were included. The first correctly sampled peak (i.e. 3-5 h after ≥ third administration, regardless of dose per patient) was included. Simulated prediction models were developed using multiple linear regression. RESULTS: 770 patients were included. eGFR and hospital affected the association between dose and anti-Xa level. The doses for peak anti-Xa levels of 0.75 IU/ml differed substantially between hospitals and ranged from 55 to 91, 65-359 and 68-168 IU/kg in eGFR 15-29, 30-60 and > 60 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively. In eGFR 15-29 and 30-60 ml/min/1.73m2, doses of 75 % and 91 % of 86 IU/kg respectively, were needed for anti-Xa levels normally occurring in patients with eGFR > 60 ml/min. CONCLUSION: We advise against anti-Xa based dose-adjustments as long as anti-Xa assays between laboratories are not harmonized and an anti-Xa target range is not validated. A better approach might be to target levels similar to eGFR > 60 ml/min/1.73m2, which are achieved by smaller dose reductions.

Large variation in anti-factor Xa levels with nadroparin as thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 critically ill patients.

PURPOSE: Critically ill COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients receive thromboprophylaxis with the LMWH nadroparin. Whether a standard dosage is adequate in attaining the target anti-FXa levels (0.20-0.50 IU/ml) in these groups is unknown. METHODS: This study was a prospective, observational study in the ICU of a large general teaching hospital in the Netherlands. COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU who received LMWH in a prophylactic dosage of 2850 IU, 5700 IU or 11400 IU subcutaneously were eligible for the study. Anti-FXa levels were determined 4 h after administration. Relevant laboratory parameters, prespecified co-variates and clinical data were extracted from the electronic health record system. The primary goal was to evaluate anti-FXa levels in critically ill patients on a prophylactic dosage of nadroparin. The second goal was to investigate whether covariates had an influence on anti-FXa levels. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were included in the analysis. In the COVID-19 group and non-COVID-19 group, 29 (96%) and 12 patients (38%) reached anti-FXa levels above 0.20 IU/ml, respectively. In the non-COVID-19 group, 63% of the patients had anti-FXA levels below the target range. When adjusted for nadroparin dosage a significant relation was found between body weight and the anti-FXa level (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: A standard nadroparin dosage of 2850 IU sc in the critically ill patient is not sufficient to attain target anti-FXa levels in the majority of the studied patient group. We suggest a standard higher dosage in combination with body-weight dependent dosing as it leads to better exposure to nadroparin. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered, ClinicalTrials.gov ID NTC 05926518 g, date of registration 06/01/23, unique ID 2020/1725.

Low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnancies without thrombophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically evaluate the efficacy of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to prevent preeclampsia in high risk pregnant women without thrombophilia. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library were searched for articles published before 1st August 2022 using the combination keywords "preeclampsia", "Low Molecular Weight Heparin", "LMWH", "Heparin, Low Molecular Weight", "Dalteparin", "Nadroparin", and "Tinzaparin". SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of LMWH in pregnant women at high risk of preeclampsia without thrombophilia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis (1758 patients in total). Outcomes were expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: LMWH reduced the incidence of PE (RR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.50-0.90; P = 0.009) in high risk pregnant women without thrombophilia. Subgroup analysis found that the prophylactic effect of LMWH was only significant in studies using low-dose aspirin (LDA) as the primary intervention. The combination of LMWH and LDA was also effective for the prevention of preterm birth and fetal growth restriction, but had no effect on the incidence of placenta abruption. CONCLUSION: For women at high risk of developing preeclampsia without thrombophilia, the combination of LMWH and low-dose aspirin is effective for the prevention of preeclampsia, preterm birth and fetal growth restriction and is superior to LDA alone.

The effect of renal impairment and obesity on anti-Xa peak and trough levels in patients receiving therapeutic doses of nadroparin: a comparison with control patients.

PURPOSE: Anti-Xa peak level monitoring is recommended during LMWH treatment in renal impairment or obesity. The trough level has been proposed as marker for bleeding. We studied the influence of renal impairment and obesity on anti-Xa levels. METHODS: Peak and trough levels were collected during therapeutic nadroparin treatment in patients with renal impairment, obese patients, and controls. 27 patients (n = 68 samples) were evaluated and combined with published data (n = 319 samples from 35 patients) using population pharmacokinetic (popPK) modelling. RESULTS: Median peak level was 0.44 and 0.95 IU/mL in renal impairment with and without dose reduction and 0.60 and 0.43 IU/mL in obesity and controls, respectively. Trough levels were < 0.5 IU/mL in all patients with renal impairment with dose reduction and in 5/6 control patients. In the popPK model, total body weight and eGFR were covariates for clearance and lean body weight for distribution volume. Model-based evaluations demonstrated peak levels below the therapeutic window in controls and increased levels in renal impairment. Dose reductions resulted in a different effect on peak and trough levels. Obese patients (BMI up to 32 kg/m2) had similar levels upon weight-based dosing. CONCLUSION: In renal impairment, anti-Xa peak levels after dose reduction are comparable to those in controls. Weight-based dosing is suitable for obese patients. Aiming for peak levels between 0.6 and 1.0 IU/mL in these patients would result in overexposure compared to controls. Considering the association of trough levels and bleeding risk and our findings, trough monitoring seems to be a suitable parameter to identify nadroparin accumulation.

Rivaroxaban versus nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis following thoracic surgery for lung cancer: A randomized, noninferiority trial.

The benefit of rivaroxaban in thromboprophylaxis after oncologic lung surgery remains unknown. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, patients who underwent thoracic surgery for lung cancer were enrolled, and randomly assigned to rivaroxaban or nadroparin groups in a 1:1 ratio; anticoagulants were initiated 12-24 h after surgery and continued until discharge. Four hundred participants were required according to a noninferiority margin of 2%, assuming venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurrence rates of 6.0% and 12.6% for patients in the rivaroxaban and nadroparin groups, respectively. The primary efficacy outcome was any VTE during the treatment and 30-day follow-up periods. The safety outcome was any on-treatment bleeding event. Finally, 403 patients were randomized (intention-to-treat [ITT] population), with 381 included in per-protocol (PP) population. The primary efficacy outcomes occurred in 12.5% (25/200) of the rivaroxaban group and 17.7% (36/203) of the nadroparin group (absolute risk reduction, -5.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], [-12.2-1.7]), indicating the noninferiority of rivaroxaban in ITT population. Sensitivity analysis was performed in the PP population and yielded similar results, confirming the noninferiority of rivaroxaban. In the safety analysis population, the incidence of any on-treatment bleeding events did not differ significantly between the groups (12.2% for rivaroxaban vs. 7.0% for nadroparin; relative risk [RR], 1.9; 95% CI, [0.9-3.7]; p = .08), including major bleeding (9.7% vs. 6.5%; RR, 1.6 [95% CI, 0.9-3.7]; p = .24), and nonmajor bleeding (2.6% vs. 0.5%; RR, 5.2 [95% CI, 0.6-45.2]; p = .13). Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis after oncologic lung surgery was shown to be noninferior to nadroparin.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Probability of Target Attainment Analysis of Nadroparin in Different Stages of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The risk of thrombotic complications in critical patients with COVID-19 remains extremely high, and multicenter trials failed to prove a survival benefit of escalated doses of low-molecular-weight heparins (nadroparin calcium) in this group. The aim of this study was to develop a pharmacokinetic model of nadroparin according to different stages of COVID-19 severity. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from 43 patients with COVID-19 who received nadroparin and were treated with conventional oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We recorded clinical, biochemical, and hemodynamic variables during 72 h of treatment. The analyzed data comprised 782 serum nadroparin concentrations and 219 anti-Xa levels. We conducted population nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM) and performed Monte Carlo simulations of the probability of target attainment for reaching 0.2-0.5 IU/mL anti-Xa levels in study groups. RESULTS: We successfully developed a one-compartment model to describe the population pharmacokinetics of nadroparin in different stages of COVID-19. The absorption rate constant of nadroparin was 3.8 and 3.2 times lower, concentration clearance was 2.22 and 2.93 times higher, and anti-Xa clearance was 0.87 and 1.1 times higher in mechanically ventilated patients and the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group compared with patients treated with conventional oxygen, respectively. The newly developed model indicated that 5.900 IU of nadroparin given subcutaneously twice daily in the mechanically ventilated patients led to a similar probability of target attainment of 90% as 5.900 IU of subcutaneous nadroparin given once daily in the group supplemented with conventional oxygen. CONCLUSIONS: Different nadroparin dosing is required for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to achieve the same targets as those for non-critically ill patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT05621915.

Identify Key Genes Correlated to Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Aging Livers.

Background: With the intensification of population aging, the proportion of aging livers in the donor pool is increasing rapidly. Compared with young livers, aging livers are more susceptible to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) during liver transplantation, which greatly affects the utilization rate of aging livers. The potential risk factors associated with IRI in aging livers have not been fully elucidated. Methods: In this work, five human liver tissue expression profiling datasets (GSE61260, GSE107037, GSE89632, GSE133815, and GSE151648) and a total of 28 young and aging liver tissues of human (N = 20) and mouse (N = 8) were used to screen and verify the potential risk factors associated with aging livers being more prone to IRI. DrugBank Online was used to screen drugs with potential to alleviate IRI in aging livers. Results: The gene expression profile and immune cell composition between young and aging livers had significant differences. Among the differentially expressed genes, aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like (ARNTL), BTG antiproliferation factor 2 (BTG2), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10), chitinase 3-like 1 (CHI3L1), immediate early response 3 (IER3), Fos proto-oncogene, AP-1 transcription factor subunit (FOS), and peroxisome proliferative activated receptor, gamma, coactivator 1 alpha (PPARGC1A), mainly involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, metabolism, and inflammation, were also dysregulated in liver tissues suffered from IRI and could form a FOS-centered interaction network. Nadroparin was screened out with the potential to target FOS in DrugBank Online. In addition, the proportion of dendritic cells (DCs) was significantly upregulated in aging livers. Conclusions: We combined the expression profiling datasets of liver tissues and samples collected in our hospital for the first time to reveal that the changes in the expression of ARNTL, BTG2, CXCL10, CHI3L1, IER3, FOS, and PPARGC1A and the proportion of dendritic cells may be associated with aging livers being more prone to IRI. Nadroparin may be used to mitigate IRI in aging livers by targeting FOS, and regulation of DC activity may also reduce IRI.

Anticoagulation therapy early is safe in portal vein thrombosis patients with acute variceal bleeding: a multi-centric randomized controlled trial.

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and acute variceal bleeding (AVB) are frequent complications of cirrhosis. The efficacy, safety, and timing of anticoagulant treatment in cirrhotic patients with PVT and AVB are contentious issues. We aimed to establish the safety and efficacy of initiating nadroparin calcium-warfarin sequential (NWS) anticoagulation therapy early after esophageal variceal band ligation within PVT patients having cirrhosis and AVB. Cirrhotic patients having AVB and PVT who underwent EVL were included and randomly allocated to either the NWS therapy group (1-month nadroparin calcium by subcutaneous injection following 5-month warfarin through oral administration, n = 43) or the control group (without any anticoagulation therapy, n = 43). The primary endpoint was the rate of PVT recanalization. Secondary endpoints included major bleeding events mainly referring to variceal rebleeding (5-day failure, 14-day, 4-week, 6-week, and 6-month rebleeding rates) and mortality after EVL. The overall recanalization (complete and partial) rate in the NWS therapy group was significantly higher than that in the control group (67.4% vs. 39.5%, P = 0.009). Low Child-Pugh score (P = 0.039, OR: 0.692, 95% CI 0.488-0.982), D-dimer < 2.00 ug/mL (P = 0.030, OR: 3.600, 95% CI 1.134-11.430), and NWS anticoagulation therapy (P = 0.002, OR: 4.189, 95% CI 1.660-10.568) were the predictors of PVT recanalization through univariate analysis of binary logistic regression. NWS anticoagulation therapy (P = 0.003, OR: 4.506, 95% CI 1.687-12.037) was the independent factor of recanalization through multivariate analysis. Nobody bled except for variceal rebleeding. Five-day failure and 14-day rebleeding were zero. There were no significantly different in 4-week (2.3% vs. 4.7%, P = 1.000), 6-week (4.7% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.672) and 6-month rebleeding (18.6% vs. 20.9%, P = 0.787) between the two groups. There was no mortality during six months follow-up. Low serum albumin (P = 0.011, OR: 0.844, 95% CI 0.741-0.962), high MELD score (P = 0.003, OR: 1.564, 95% CI 1.167-2.097) and Child-Pugh score (P = 0.006, OR: 1.950, 95% CI 1.206-3.155) were predictors of rebleeding by univariate analysis of binary logistic regression analysis. The Child-Pugh score (7 [6-8] vs. 6 [5-7], P = 0.003) and albumin levels (33.93 ± 5.30 vs. 37.28 ± 4.32, P = 0.002) were improved in the NWS therapy group at six months. In PVT patients with cirrhosis and AVB, starting NWS anticoagulation therapy early after EVL was safe and effective. It has the potential to raise albumin levels and improve liver function.

Population pharmacokinetics of nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 intensive care unit patients.

AIMS: Nadroparin is administered to COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) patients as thromboprophylaxis. Despite existing population pharmacokinetic (PK) models for nadroparin in literature, the population PK of nadroparin in COVID-19 ICU patients is unknown. Moreover, optimal dosing regimens achieving anti-Xa target levels (0.3-0.7 IU/mL) are unknown. Therefore, a population PK analysis was conducted to investigate different dosing regimens of nadroparin in COVID-19 ICU patients. METHODS: Anti-Xa levels (n = 280) from COVID-19 ICU patients (n = 65) receiving twice daily (BID) 5700 IU of subcutaneous nadroparin were collected to perform a population PK analysis with NONMEM v7.4.1. Using Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1000), predefined dosing regimens were evaluated. RESULTS: A 1-compartment model with an absorption compartment adequately described the measured anti-Xa levels with interindividual variability estimated for clearance (CL). Inflammation parameters C-reactive protein, D-dimer and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation allowed to explain the interindividual variability of CL. Moreover, CL was decreased in patients receiving corticosteroids (22.5%) and vasopressors (25.1%). Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that 5700 IU BID was the most optimal dosing regimen of the simulated regimens for achieving prespecified steady-state t = 4 h anti-Xa levels with 56.7% on target (0.3-0.7 IU/mL). CONCLUSION: In our study, clearance of nadroparin is associated with an increase in inflammation parameters, use of corticosteroids, vasopression and renal clearance in critically ill patients. Furthermore, of the simulated regimens, targeted anti-Xa levels were most adequately achieved with a dosing regimen of 5700 IU BID. Future studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of found covariate relationships.

Low and Highly Variable Exposure to Prophylactic LMWH Nadroparin in Critically Ill Patients: Back to the Drawing Board for Prophylactic Dosing?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Low-molecular-weight heparins are routinely administered to patients in the intensive care unit to prevent venous thromboembolisms. There is considerable evidence that low-molecular-weight heparin doses should be personalised based on anti-Xa levels, but pharmacokinetic data in intensive care unit patients are lacking. This study aimed to characterise the pharmacokinetics and associated variability of the low-molecular-weight heparin nadroparin in critically ill patients. METHODS: Critically ill adult patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit and received nadroparin for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism were included in a study. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by means of parametric non-linear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM). RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled with 12 patients undergoing continuous veno-venous hemodialysis and 18 patients not undergoing continuous veno-venous hemodialysis. Very high variability in pharmacokinetics was observed with an inter-individual variability in the volume of distribution of 63.7% (95% confidence interval 46.5-90.6), clearance of 166% (95% confidence interval 84.7-280) and relative bioavailability of 40.2% (95% confidence interval 29.5-52.6). We found that standard doses of 2850 IE and 5700 IE of nadroparin resulted in sub-prophylactic exposure in critically ill patients. CONCLUSIONS: Low exposure and highly variable pharmacokinetics of nadroparin were observed in intensive care unit patients treated with a prophylactic dose. It can be debated whether nadroparin is currently dosed optimally in intensive care unit patients and our findings encourage the investigation of higher and tailored dosing of nadroparin in the critically ill.

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins (LMWH) and Synthetic Factor X Inhibitors Can Impair the Osseointegration Process of a Titanium Implant in an Interventional Animal Study.

Background and objectives: Cementless total hip arthroplasty is a common surgical procedure and perioperative thromboprophylaxis is used to prevent deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Osseointegration is important for long-term implant survival, and there is no research on the effect of different thromboprophylaxis agents on the process of osseointegration. Materials and Methods: Seventy rats were allocated as follows: Group I (control group), Group II (enoxaparin), Group III (nadroparin), and Group IV (fondaparinux). Ovariectomy was performed on all subjects, followed by the introduction of an intramedullary titanium implant into the femur. Thromboprophylaxis was administered accordingly to each treatment group for 35 days postoperatively. Results: Group I had statistically significantly lower anti-Xa levels compared to treatment groups. Micro-CT analysis showed that nadroparin had lower values compared to control in bone volume (0.12 vs. 0.21, p = 0.01) and percent bone volume (1.46 vs. 1.93, p = 0.047). The pull-out test showed statistically significant differences between the control group (8.81 N) compared to enoxaparin, nadroparin, and fondaparinux groups (4.53 N, 4 N and 4.07 N, respectively). Nadroparin had a lower histological cortical bone tissue and a higher width of fibrous tissue (27.49 µm and 86.9 µm) at the peri-implant area, compared to control (43.2 µm and 39.2 µm), enoxaparin (39.6 µm and 24 µm), and fondaparinux (36.2 µm and 32.7 µm). Conclusions: Short-term administration of enoxaparin, nadroparin, and fondaparinux can reduce the osseointegration of titanium implants, with nadroparin having the most negative effect. These results show that enoxaparin and fondaparinux are preferred to be administered due to a lesser negative impact on the initial implant fixation.

Trough anti-Xa activity after intermediate dose nadroparin for thrombosis prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and acute kidney injury.

Our objective was to assess the incidence of drug bioaccumulation in critically ill COVID-19 patients with AKI receiving intermediate dose nadroparin for thrombosis prophylaxis. We conducted a Prospective cohort study of critically ill COVID-19 patients. In patients on intermediate dose nadroparin (5700 IU once daily) we assessed the incidence of bioaccumulation (trough anti-Xa level > 0.2 IU/mL) stratified according to presence of AKI. We quantified this association using multilevel analyses. To assess robustness of our observations, we explored the association between AKI and anti-Xa activity in patients receiving high dose nadroparin (> 5700 IU). 108 patients received intermediate dose nadroparin, of whom 24 had AKI during 36 anti-Xa measurements. One patient with AKI (4.2% [95%CI 0.1-21%]) and 1 without (1.2% [95%CI 0.03-6.5%]) developed bioaccumulation (p = 0.39). Development of AKI was associated with a mean increase of 0.04 (95%CI 0.02-0.05) IU/ml anti-Xa activity. There was no statistically significant association between anti-Xa activity and AKI in 51 patients on high dose nadroparin. There were four major bleeding events, all in patients on high dose nadroparin. In conclusion, Bioaccumulation of an intermediate dose nadroparin did not occur to a significant extent in critically ill patients with COVID-19 complicated by AKI. Dose adjustment in AKI may be unnecessary.

Critical appraisal of evidence for anti-Xa monitoring and dosing of low-molecular-weight heparin in renal insufficiency.

INTRODUCTION: Several guidelines advise to monitor therapeutic LMWH therapy with peak anti-Xa concentrations in renal insufficiency with subsequent dose adjustments. A better understanding of the clinical association between peak anti-Xa concentrations and clinical outcomes is mandatory, because misunderstanding this association could lead to erroneous, and potentially even harmful, LMWH dose adjustments. AREAS COVERED: We reviewed the evidence of the widely applied therapeutic window for anti-Xa peak concentrations and report on the evidence for pharmacokinetic dose reduction in renal insufficiency, limitations of peak and trough anti-Xa concentration monitoring. EXPERT OPINION: The added value of peak anti-Xa monitoring in patients with renal insufficiency, receiving a dose reduced for pharmacokinetic changes, is not supported by data. Enoxaparin and nadroparin should be adjusted to 50-65% and 75-85% of the original dose for patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCL) of <30 ml/min and 30-60 ml/min, respectively. Tinzaparin should be adjusted to around 50% of the original dose for patients with a CrCL of <30 ml/min. In case anti-Xa monitoring is applied, trough concentration anti-Xa monitoring is preferred over peak monitoring, aiming at a maximum concentration of 0.4 IU/mL for once-daily dosed tinzaparin and 0.5 IU/mL for twice-daily dosed enoxaparin and nadroparin.

Glycan Mapping of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Using Mass Spectral Correction Based on Chromatography Fitting with "Glycomapping" Software.

In this work, the first version of "Glycomapping" software is developed for the analysis of the most common low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), enoxaparin. Using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, size exclusion chromatography is applied, and a virtual database of glycans in enoxaparin is established for the initial searching. With "Glycomapping", a complex chromatogram can be fitted, significantly improving resolution and confirming an accurate distribution range for each size of glycan within enoxaparin. In addition, randomly matched MS data can be corrected, with the constraint of the corresponding chromatographic retention time range, to remove most false positive data. The analytical stability of "Glycomapping" software was confirmed. Enoxaparin, prepared by different manufacturers and from different animal sources, was analyzed using "Glycomapping." Compared to raw data, data processed with "Glycomapping" are more robust and accurate. Another two LMWHs, nadroparin and dalteparin could also be analyzed with this software. This work lays a solid foundation for the automated analysis of heterogeneous mixtures of natural glycans, such as LMWHs and other complex oligosaccharides and polysaccharides.

Optimising the Nadroparin Dose for Thromboprophylaxis During Hemodialysis by Developing a Population Pharmacodynamic Model Using Anti-Xa Levels.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal nadroparin dose in patients undergoing hemodialysis is difficult to determine in clinical practice. Anti-Xa levels ≥ 0.4 IU/mL and < 2.0 IU/mL are suggested to prevent thrombus formation within the extracorporeal circuit whilst minimizing bleeding risk. We aimed to characterize the variability in the association between dose and anti-Xa levels, identify patient and dialysis characteristics that explained this variability, and optimize nadroparin dosing based on the identified characteristics. METHODS: Anti-Xa samples were collected in patients who received intravenous nadroparin as thromboprophylaxis during routine dialysis sessions. A population pharmacodynamic model was developed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling. The percentage of patients ≥ 0.4 IU/mL (efficacy) and < 2.0 IU/mL (safety) was simulated for different doses, patient and dialysis characteristics. RESULTS: Patients (n = 137) were predominantly receiving standard hemodialysis (84.7% vs. hemodiafiltration 15.3%) and had a mean bodyweight of 76.3 kg (± 16.9). Lean body mass (LBM), mode of dialysis, and dialyzer partially explained between-subject variability in anti-Xa levels. Patients on hemodiafiltration and those receiving hemodialysis with a high LBM (≥ 80 kg) had a low probability (< 29%) of anti-Xa levels ≥ 0.4 IU/mL during the entire dialysis session. All patients, except hemodialysis patients with a low LBM (< 50 kg), had a high probability (> 70%) of peak anti-Xa levels < 2.0 IU/mL. CONCLUSION: Mainly patients receiving hemodiafiltration and those receiving hemodialysis with a high LBM can benefit from a higher nadroparin dose than currently used in clinical practice, while having anti-Xa levels < 2.0 IU/mL.

[Hyperkalemia due to low-molecular-weight heparin]. / Hyperkaliëmie bij laag-molecuulgewicht heparine.

BACKGROUND: The cause of hyperkalemia is frequently iatrogenic. Patient's prescriptions should therefore be checked in the analysis of the hyperkalemia. Low-molecular-weight heparin is not often suspected to cause this. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 64-year-old man, hospitalized because of a complicated clinical course of pancreatitis, developed an acute severe hyperkalemia. Further analysis was susceptive for hypoaldosteronism, which was confirmed with biochemical testing. The only drug that could cause hyperkalemia in this case was nadroparin, which was prescribed because of vena lienalis and a superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. A rechallenge with nadroparin showed a rapid rise in serum potassium, confirming our suspicion. CONCLUSION: In the diagnostic work-up of hyperkalemia, hypoaldosteronism should be considered in patients using LMWH. In particular when other risk factors for hyperkalemia are present, monitoring of potassium could be advised in patients receiving these agents.

Localized and Generalized Skin Adverse Drug Reactions to Nadroparin Calcium Injection in 6 Cases of Pregnant Women.

Background: Despite the increasing number of skin adverse drug reactions caused by nadroparin calcium have been reported, mostly, little is known regarding of their details of clinical characteristics, especially for generalized skin adverse drug reactions. We sought to evaluate localized and generalized characteristics of the skin adverse drug reaction to nadroparin calcium injection in pregnant women. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 6 pregnant women, who experienced localized and generalized skin adverse drug reactions during long-term nadroparin calcium injection. The patients' clinical and imaging information were retrieved from medical records. The skin prick test, patch test, and intradermal test were performed after they stopped lactation. Causality assessment of suspected adverse drug reactions was performed on these cases. Results: The average total dose of nadroparin calcium injection in the 6 cases was 64.17 ± 22.66. Localized skin adverse drug reaction, manifested as erythema at the injection point, appeared after 47.5 ± 17.4 days of subcutaneous injection of nadroparin calcium. Generalized urticaria-like lesions, progressing from the injection site on the abdomen, appeared in 5.17 ± 3.60 days after the first appearance of localized reaction, while laboratory test results revealed essential peripheral blood eosinophilia. All rashes in the 6 cases subsided in 2-5 weeks after drug withdrawal. After delivery, 5 of 6 cases received complete skin tests to evaluate drug hypersensitivity. Results presented positive in the intradermal test within 7 days. Both the skin prick test and skin patch test were negative. Localized skin reactions and generalized urticaria-like adverse drug reactions were considered as definitely and probably caused by nadroparin calcium injection, respectively. Conclusion: Subcutaneous injection of nadroparin calcium in pregnant women appears to be at risk of localized and generalized urticaria-like adverse drug reaction. It is important to follow up the pregnant woman during nadroparin calcium injection for evaluating adverse drug reactions. Timely detection of symptoms is pivotal in early diagnosis and treatment of adverse drug reactions.

Pharmacokinetic profiles of intravenous versus subcutaneous administration of low molecular weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are recommended for thromboprophylaxis in ICU patients but often fail to reach adequate peak anti-Xa activity. OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of intravenous (IV) versus subcutaneous (SC) route of administration of LMWH. METHOD: This was a prospective, monocentric, randomized trial. Patients were randomized to the IV route of administration with a 4-h infusion of nadroparin 3800 IU or to the SC route of administration. Randomization was stratified according to the need for vasopressor or not. Anti-Xa activity was measured at baseline, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h after the administration was started. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included, of whom 30 were randomized to the IV group and 30 to the SC route. Pharmacokinetic profiles were significantly different. Mean peak anti-Xa activity was 0.38 IU/ml in the IV group vs 0.20 IU/ml in the SC group (p < 0.001). Trough values and AUC (0-24 h) were similar in both groups. Pharmacokinetic profiles were similar whether patients received vasopressors or not. CONCLUSIONS: The IV route of administration with a 4-h infusion lead to a significantly higher peak anti-Xa activity without affecting trough value or the AUC (0-24 h). Whether the IV administration of LMWH might improve the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis requires further research. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04982055, retrospectively registered 08 July 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04982055?cond=NCT04982055&draw=2&rank=1.

Effect of low-molecular-weight heparins on anti-Xa peak levels and adverse reactions in Chinese patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion: a single-center, observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare three commonly used low-molecular-weight heparins (LWMHs) in the treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) by evaluating the anti-Xa peak levels and adverse reactions. METHODS: In this single-center, observational study, we enrolled 310 patients with RSA in whom anti-Xa levels were measured during pregnancy. Patients were divided into three groups according to the LMWH they used: the nadroparin group, enoxaparin group and dalteparin group. We compared the peak anti-Xa levels and the coagulation status of each group, and analyzed the incidence of adverse reactions, including local allergy, liver and renal dysfunction, and the impact on platelet. RESULTS: Patients in the enoxaparin group had a higher anti-Xa peak level than those in the nadroparin group (0.80 ± 0.22 IU/ml vs. 0.61 ± 0.24 IU/ml; P <  0.0001), although most patients in the three groups reached the target concentration of anti-Xa. Furthermore, patients in the enoxaparin group had a more stable anti-Xa levels during pregnancy. In addition, patients in the nadroparin group had a higher rate of local allergy than those in the enoxaparin group (60.5% vs. 42.5%; P = 0.004) and those in the dalteparin group (60.5% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.002). Further examination by the type of local allergy indicated a dramatic difference in pruritus and induration between the nadroparin group and the other two groups. No difference was found in the incidence of liver and renal dysfunction and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Compared with nadroparin and daltepatin, enoxaparin showed a better performance regarding anti-Xa levels and the incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment of RSA.